Goals and objectives/outcomes of the research investigation
Goal 1 – Decrease the Amount of Time
At Risk and Low Income Students are removed from class for disciplinary action,
including In School Suspension and Alternative Education Placement.
Goal 2 – Find Alternative
Disciplinary Consequences to maximize time spent in the classroom by students
in Target Population.
Goal 3 – Improve student success in
classroom work and on benchmark exams by students in Target Population
Goal 4 – Create a program that
encourages Teacher Buy in/Support from 85% of the staff on our campus.
Activities designed to achieve the objectives
Ø
Survey Staff on ideas for need and types of
alternative discipline ideas completed in May 2012
Ø
Start of committee to come up with solutions to
keeping Target Population kids in the classroom maximum amount of time. (Start
in May 2012 –February 2013)
Ø
Disaggregate Data to share with committee to
show need for Action Research Plan in this Area (Start February 2012-May 2012)
Ø
Self – Reflection to identify any areas of bias
that may affect our results.
Resources and research tools needed for data gathering
Ø
List of At Risk and Economically Disadvantaged
Students in 7th through 10th Grade
Ø
Quantitative Measures: 6 week Report Cards,
Benchmark Scores, and TAKS Scores
Ø
Interview Students in Target Populations with
parent permission
Ø
Interview Focus Group of Students not in Target
Populations to see how negative student behavior affects their learning in the
classroom with parent permission
Ø
Survey Staff and Parents regarding beliefs about
school cultures/climate with focus on student behavior and discipline
Draft timeline for completion or implementation of activities
Ø
May 2012 – Select Sample Size of Target
Population by disaggregating data of ECD/At Risk Students with multiple
Discipline referrals resulting in time spent in ISS or AEP.
Ø
March-May 2012 – Look at data to chart grades
throughout year in regards to time spent out of classroom serving disciplinary
action in ISS or AEP.
Ø
April-May 2012 – Interview students, Survey
staff and parents and form Action Committee to address needs.
Ø
August-December 2012 – Implement Alternative
Forms of Discipline with ISS being reserved for severe behavior, as agreed upon
by the staff.
Ø
January – February 2013 – Benchmark Data
obtained
Ø
February 2013 – Review Data to see if
interventions have been successful. Revise Action Plan as necessary or continue
if results show progress.
Persons responsible for implementation of the action research plan
Ø
Assigning Discipline – Assistant Principal
Ø
Brainstorming Alternative Discipline – Shawn
Adkins, Marquelle Adkins and the Action Committee
Ø
Data Disaggregation – Shawn Adkins and Marquelle
Adkins
Process for monitoring the achievement of goals and objectives
Ø
Compare report card grades from previous year
Ø
Compare benchmark scores from previous year.
Ø
Compare number of referrals written to previous
year.
Ø
Compare time spent out of classroom to previous
year.
Assessment instrument(s) to evaluate the effectiveness of the action
research study
Ø
Quantitative – Benchmarks, Report Card Grades,
Time Spent in ISS/AEP, and Number of Discipline Referrals
Ø
Qualitative – Teacher survey, Parent Survey, and
Student Interviews.
References
Dana,
N. (2009). Leading with Passion and Knowledge: The Principal as Action
Researcher.
California: Corwin.